Peer Review Policy

The publication of articles in JEDUCHI-ISC (Journal of Educational Management and Educational Technology) depends on the validity and scientific coherence evaluated by the Editorial Board and the Reviewer Board, which will assess whether the article is comprehensive and whether the work is a scientific contribution that is useful for future researchers. JEDUCHI-ISC (Journal of Educational Management and Educational Technology) appreciates the efforts and suggestions provided by the Reviewer Board.

Initial Manuscript Evaluation

The Editorial Board will first evaluate all submitted manuscripts. Although rare, outstanding manuscripts may be accepted at this stage. Those rejected at this stage are not sufficiently original, have serious scientific flaws, or are outside the scope of JEDUCHI-ISC (Journal of Educational Management and Educational Technology). Those that meet the minimum criteria will be forwarded to experts for review.

Types of Review

Manuscripts submitted will generally be reviewed by two to three experts who will be asked to evaluate whether the manuscript is scientifically sensible and coherent, whether it duplicates published work, and whether the manuscript is clear enough to be published or not. The review method used is Double-Blind Peer Review.

Final Decision

The editor is responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the manuscript. The editor will make decisions based on reports and consult with members of the Editorial Board. The editor's decision is final.